Cycles is a visual feedback and approval tool for web development projects.
Current Customer(s)
Market Share (Est.)
Ranking
The top three of Cycles’s competitors in the In-App User Feedback category are Inline Manual with 58.20%, Beamer with 26.54%, Mopinion with 4.06% market share.
Technology | Domains | Market Share (Est.) | Versus page |
---|---|---|---|
Inline Manual | 4993 | 58.20% | Cycles vs Inline Manual |
Beamer | 2277 | 26.54% | Cycles vs Beamer |
Mopinion | 348 | 4.06% | Cycles vs Mopinion |
TrackDuck | 294 | 3.43% | Cycles vs TrackDuck |
Tooltip.io | 277 | 3.23% | Cycles vs Tooltip.io |
Doorbell | 97 | 1.13% | Cycles vs Doorbell |
Instabug | 96 | 1.12% | Cycles vs Instabug |
Pulse Insights | 63 | 0.73% | Cycles vs Pulse Insights |
Apptentive | 39 | 0.45% | Cycles vs Apptentive |
AskingPoint | 28 | 0.33% | Cycles vs AskingPoint |
Bugyard | 26 | 0.30% | Cycles vs Bugyard |
BugFeedr | 9 | 0.10% | Cycles vs BugFeedr |
UserCare | 5 | 0.06% | Cycles vs UserCare |
Artisan | 5 | 0.06% | Cycles vs Artisan |
Balto.io | 4 | 0.05% | Cycles vs Balto.io |
Appstark | 3 | 0.03% | Cycles vs Appstark |
HelpStack | 3 | 0.03% | Cycles vs HelpStack |
InSite Feedback | 2 | 0.02% | Cycles vs InSite Feedback |
Popular Comparisons
The top three of Cycles’s competitors in the In-App User Feedback category are Inline Manual with 58.20%, Beamer with 26.54%, Mopinion with 4.06% market share.
Cycles vs Inline Manual
Cycles vs Beamer
Cycles vs Mopinion
Cycles vs TrackDuck
Cycles vs Tooltip.io
Cycles vs Doorbell
Cycles vs Instabug
Cycles vs Pulse Insights
Around the world in 2025, over 10 companies have started using Cycles as In-App User Feedback tool.
Customers | Employee Range | City | Region | Country | Social Links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycles | 20 - 49 | Denver | Colorado | United States | |
Box & Lock Self Storage | 10 - 19 | Townsville | Queensland | Australia | |
IPM Associates, Inc. | 0 - 9 | Plano | Texas | United States | |
Moyer Fuel Tank Renu | 0 - 9 | Greensburg | Pennsylvania | United States | |
Vetter | 0 - 9 | Kildare | Leinster | Ireland | |
Self Storage Australia | 0 - 9 | Elizabeth | South Australia | Australia | |
PRQ Australia | 0 - 9 | Brisbane | Queensland | Australia | |
RushKult | 0 - 9 | Amsterdam | North Holland | Netherlands | |
Tile Reglue Injection Method | 0 - 9 | Longford | Tasmania | Australia | |
All Secure Self Storage | 20 - 49 | Wellington | Wellington | New Zealand |
The top three products and services offering customers that use Cycles for In-App User Feedback are Safety Audit (1), Warehouse Storage Systems (1), Packaging (1).
Customers
The majority of Cycles's customers for the in-app-user-feedback category fall in the company size of 0 - 9 employees (7 companies), 20 - 49 employees (2 companies), 10 - 19 employees (1 companies).
Employee Size
The top three geographies of Cycles for in-app-user-feedback are the Australia with 4(40.00%), United States with 3(30.00%), Netherlands with 1(10.00%) customers respectively.
Customers
Find answers to the most often asked questions by users.
Who are the top Cycles competitors?
Cycles’s Top competitors in the in-app-user-feedback category are Inline Manual, Beamer, Mopinion. You can view a full list of Cycles competitors here. 6sense uses advanced data mining and AI algorithms to track customers and competitors of Cycles and 40,000 other technologies on the internet. You can also compare Cycles and its feature with top competitors here : Cycles vs Inline Manual Cycles vs Beamer Cycles vs Mopinion.
What is Cycles customer distribution based on company size?
What is Cycles market share in the in-app-user-feedback?
What are the top countries that use Cycles?
What are the top industries that use Cycles?
Close deals faster by understanding your clients well. Know their technology stack, contract renewal date, top decision-makers, hiring trends, and top company news in one place.
Get a demo